Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415436›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Information Sources Used by Oncologists to Understand Multi-marker Tumor Panel Tests for Cancer Patients.

Susan S Buckenmaier, Michelle A Mollica, Andrew Freedman, Erin E Kent, Janet S de Moor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan S BuckenmaierDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA. susan.buckenmaier@nih.gov.
Michelle A MollicaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
Andrew FreedmanDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
Erin E KentDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Janet S de MoorDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine using multi-marker tumor panel (MMTP) testing can help inform cancer treatment decisions. Oncologists' knowledge of these tests and their ability to find up-to-date information about their application in clinical care is essential. This study aimed to (1) describe information sources used by oncologists to learn about new genomic tests and (2) examine characteristics associated with the use of each information source. The National Cancer Institute's National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment surveyed a nationally representative sample of oncologists about MMTP testing. We examined the use of 11 information sources among oncologists that reported using MMTP tests (n = 1222). Bivariate analyses were used to examine whether information sources differed by oncologist- and practice-level characteristics and type of MMTP test. Most oncologists reported using peer-reviewed medical literature (88.8%), scientific conferences (87.9%), and medical professional societies (83.8%) to learn about MMTPs. In contrast, government websites, FDA inserts, and foundation resources were each used by < 36% of oncologists. The use of information sources differed by oncologist and practice characteristics. For example, a greater percentage of oncologists with an academic affiliation used peer-reviewed medical literature and scientific conferences, as compared to those without an academic affiliation (p = 0.006). As the number and type of MMTP tests increase, providing oncologists with current information about their appropriate application is essential. Further understanding of how oncologists use specific information sources may improve the dissemination and effective implementation of new MMTPs and help tailor educational interventions based on provider characteristics.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOncologistsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerGenomic testsHealthPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID32415436
OpenAlexW3024693758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.