ReviewCurrent urology reports2020
The Role of MRI in the Diagnosis of Pelvic Floor Disorders.
Review in Current urology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Following Gynecologic Cancer Surgery and Adjuvant Therapy: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management-A Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic and robotic ventral rectopexy for posterior compartment disorders: a multicentric study in a gynecological setting.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Observational
- MR defecography in assessing stress urinary incontinence with or without symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Current diagnostic tools and treatment modalities for rectal prolapse.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Vaginal tactile imaging: A review.Pelviperineology · 2023Article
- Advances in vaginal bioengineering: Applications, techniques, and needs.Current research in physiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis article provides an overview of MRI as a dynamic imaging modality as well as recent updates on the role of MRI in the evaluation of female pelvic floor disorders, including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), rectal prolapse, and defecatory dysfunction. RECENT
findingsPelvic floor disorders in women are common, and demand for treatment is high. Recently, multidisciplinary guidelines for dynamic MRI have been published to reflect this need. Despite criticisms that MRI is an expensive modality, cost-analysis studies are demonstrating utility for MRI in surgical decision-making trees for patients at risk for treatment failure after POP repairs. Novel measures such as anterior pelvic area and levator volumes are being used to predict and study patients with and at risk for POP. Recent standardized radiographic guidelines as reviewed in this paper will likely lead to improved reproducibility of dynamic MRI techniques across institutions, making complex pelvic floor assessment increasingly accessible to patients while creating opportunities for novel and collaborative research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.