Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415394›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[The long journey from palpation to biopsy : The history of diagnosing prostate cancer].

J Konert, L Sentker, C August, M Hatzinger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Konert, Kraichgaustr. 13, 76669, Bad Schönborn, Deutschland. fam@konert-home.de.
L Sentker, Hauptstraße 71, 74889, Sinsheim, Deutschland.
C AugustGemeinschaftspraxis Pathologie Hanau, Nußallee 7c, 63450, Hanau, Deutschland.
M HatzingerDiakonissenkrankenhaus Mannheim, Speyererstr. 91-93, 68163, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Diakonissenkrankenhaus · DEKlinikum Hanau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though it is thousands of years old, prostate cancer (PCa) has only been known for 200 years. Until about 50 years ago, the diagnosis could only be made by digital rectal examination. Although the first prostate biopsies were already implemented in the beginning of the last century, it only obtained importance with the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the early screening for PCa and the pathologist, thus, became an essential partner for the urologist. In more recent years, specific MRI has significantly increased the accuracy of prostate biopsies. Thus, the question arises whether this technique is going to be so meaningful one day that prostate biopsy and the associated pretherapeutic histology are going to be redundant.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyDigital Rectal ExaminationHumansMalePalpationProstate-Specific AntigenHistory of medicinePathological examinationProstate biopsyProstate carcinomaPSA Gleason-Score

Identifiers

PMID32415394
OpenAlexW3025336023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.