ArticlePediatric surgery international2020
Short-term surgical trips: local collaboration and its effects on complications and patient satisfaction.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global Spine Outreach (GSO): how to safely establish a sustainable short-term pediatric spine deformity outreach program.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Comparison of Tonsillectomy Complication Rates in a Global Underserved Community to Those of a Tertiary Medical Center.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Social Reintegration Indicators Following Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.World journal of surgery · 2025Observational
- Sustainable surgical resource initiative for Haiti: the SSRI-Haiti project.Global health action · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeShort-term surgical missions can provide communities in need with desired expertise; however, it is uncertain who will manage the complications after visiting experts leave. Poor outcomes, decreased patient satisfaction, and tension on the healthcare system develop when local providers, often excluded from the initial patient care, are unable to cope with subsequent morbidity.
methodsTwo-year retrospective review of pediatric general, plastic, and reconstructive surgery, and urology cases performed by a relief organization in the developing world. Case complexity and postoperative complications were analyzed. Phone interviews conducted with patients/families to quantify postoperative outcomes and satisfaction.
results474 surgeries were performed on pediatric patients with 60% response rate. Respondents stratified into three levels of complexity: 159 simple, 72 intermediate, and 54 advanced surgeries. Six (2.1%) high-level complications occurred. No association between the complexity of the surgery and the occurrence of a complications. 83.5% were satisfied with outcomes and > 92% were happy with the provided support.
conclusionFacilitating visiting and local surgeons performing cases together increases the expertise of local providers, strengthens infrastructure, and establishes clear follow-up. Despite complications, patients and families continued to recommend care to family and friends by the relief organization and were happy with support from local providers. Engaging local providers is the gold-standard for short-term trips.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.