ArticleScientific reports2020
Generation of Pseudo-CT using High-Degree Polynomial Regression on Dual-Contrast Pelvic MRI Data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Review
- New Challenges for Anatomists in the Era of Omics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A review of PET attenuation correction methods for PET-MR.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cognitive Computing-Based CDSS in Medical Practice.Health data science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing interests in using magnetic resonance imaging only in radiation therapy require methods for predicting the computed tomography numbers from MRI data. Here we propose a simple voxel method to generate the pseudo-CT (pCT) image using dual-contrast pelvic MRI data. The method is first trained with the CT data and dual-contrast MRI data (two sets of MRI with different sequences) of multiple patients, where the anatomical structures in the images after deformable image registration are segmented into several regions, and after MRI intensity normalizations a regression analysis is used to determine a two-variable polynomial function for each region to relate a voxel's two MRI intensity values to its CT number. We first evaluate the accuracy via the Hounsfield unit (HU) difference between the pseudo-CT and reference-CT (rCT) images and obtain the average mean absolute error as 40.3 ± 2.9 HU from leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) across all six patients, which is better than most previous results and comparable to another study using the more complicated atlas-based method. We also perform a dosimetric evaluation of the treatment plans based on pCT and rCT images and find the average passing rate within 2% dose difference to be 95.4% in point-to-point dose comparisons. Therefore, our method shows encouraging results in predicting the CT numbers. This polynomial method needs less computer storage than the interpolation method and can be readily extended to the case of more than two MRI sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.