Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Association between initial dialytic modalities and the risks of mortality, infection death, and cardiovascular events: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

Yi-Ran Tu, Tsung-Yu Tsai, Ming-Shyan Lin, Kun-Hua Tu, Cheng-Chia Lee, Victor Chien-Chia Wu, Hsiang-Hao Hsu, Ming-Yang Chang, Ya-Chung Tian, Chih-Hsiang Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yi-Ran TuKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tsung-Yu TsaiKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ming-Shyan LinDevision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Yulin, Taiwan.
Kun-Hua TuKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chia LeeKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Victor Chien-Chia WuDepartment of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Hao HsuKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ming-Yang ChangKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ya-Chung TianKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chih-Hsiang ChangKidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. franwisandsun@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7342-335X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, few studies have been conducted to pairwise compare the prognosis of peritoneal dialysis (PD), unplanned PD, and unplanned hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed longitudinal data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We included 45,165 patients whose initial dialytic modality was PD or unplanned HD between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2013. We divided the patients into three groups according to their initial dialytic modalities. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and death from infection during 1-year follow up. The risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were higher in the unplanned PD group than in the planned PD group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.60; HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32-1.80). Likewise, the risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were higher in the unplanned HD group (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48-1.82; HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.61-2.13). Furthermore, the risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were also higher in the unplanned HD group than in the unplanned PD group (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that patients whose initial modality was planned PD or unplanned PD may have better clinical outcomes than those whose initial modality was unplanned HD.

Indexed as

AgedCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfectionsKidney Failure, ChronicLongitudinal StudiesMalePrognosisProspective StudiesRenal DialysisTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID32415125
PMCPMC7229162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.