Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415065›Full record

ReviewNature communications2020

Application of combinatorial optimization strategies in synthetic biology.

Gita Naseri, Mattheos A G Koffas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mining Genetically Encoded Biosensors from Filamentous Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Harmonization trial onThe journal of liquid biopsy · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. ACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gita NaseriInstitut für Chemie, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 12489, Berlin, Germany. gita.naseri@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-3141
Mattheos A G KoffasCenter for Biotechnology, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA. koffam@rpi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-0565
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DERensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first wave of synthetic biology, genetic elements, combined into simple circuits, are used to control individual cellular functions. In the second wave of synthetic biology, the simple circuits, combined into complex circuits, form systems-level functions. However, efforts to construct complex circuits are often impeded by our limited knowledge of the optimal combination of individual circuits. For example, a fundamental question in most metabolic engineering projects is the optimal level of enzymes for maximizing the output. To address this point, combinatorial optimization approaches have been established, allowing automatic optimization without prior knowledge of the best combination of expression levels of individual genes. This review focuses on current combinatorial optimization methods and emerging technologies facilitating their applications.

Indexed as

Combinatorial Chemistry TechniquesBiosensing TechniquesComputer SimulationGene EditingSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID32415065
PMCPMC7229011
OpenAlexW3024267968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.