Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414790›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Many Paths to the Same Goal: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation during Probabilistic Route Planning.

Brian J Jackson, Gusti Lulu Fatima, Sujean Oh, David H Gire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Olfactory Sensing and Navigation in Turbulent Environments.Annual review of condensed matter physics · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Systems Neuroscience of Natural Behaviors in Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian J JacksonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Gusti Lulu FatimaDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Sujean OhDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
David H GireDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 dhgire@uw.edu.

Funding

Neural circuit mechanisms of odor localization in miceR00DC013305 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GIRE, DAVID HENRY · 2015 to 2018
$796k
Evidence accumulation across large-scale cortical networks during odor tracking by freely moving miceR21DC018649 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GIRE, DAVID HENRY, STEINMETZ, NICHOLAS · 2020 to 2021
$410k
NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013305NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During self-guided behaviors, animals identify constraints of the problems they face and adaptively employ appropriate strategies (Marsh, 2002). In the case of foraging, animals must balance sensory-guided exploration of an environment with memory-guided exploitation of known resource locations. Here, we show that animals adaptively shift cognitive resources between sensory and memory systems during foraging to optimize route planning under uncertainty. We demonstrate this using a new, laboratory-based discovery method to define the strategies used to solve a difficult route optimization scenario, the probabilistic "traveling salesman" problem (Raman and Gill, 2017; Fuentes et al., 2018; Mukherjee et al., 2019). Using this system, we precisely manipulated the strength of prior information as well as the complexity of the problem. We find that rats are capable of efficiently solving this route-planning problem, even under conditions with unreliable prior information and a large space of possible solutions. Through analysis of animals' trajectories, we show that they shift the balance between exploiting known locations and searching for new locations of rewards based on the predictability of reward locations. When compared with a Bayesian search, we found that animal performance is consistent with an approach that adaptively allocates cognitive resources between sensory processing and memory, enhancing sensory acuity and reducing memory load under conditions in which prior information is unreliable. Our findings establish new approaches to understand neural substrates of natural behavior as well as the rational development of biologically inspired approaches for complex real-world optimization.

Indexed as

CognitionMemoryAnimalsBayes TheoremRatsRewardBayesianforagingnavigation

Identifiers

PMID32414790
PMCPMC7294469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.