Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414626›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology2020

Risks from Deferring Treatment for Genitourinary Cancers: A Collaborative Review to Aid Triage and Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Christopher J D Wallis, Giacomo Novara, Laura Marandino, Axel Bex, Ashish M Kamat, R Jeffrey Karnes, Todd M Morgan, Nicolas Mottet, Silke Gillessen, Alberto Bossi and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04900259 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Bladder Cancer Presentations

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara Training and Research HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled183ConditionsBladder Cancer, Covid19ArmsCOVID-19 pandemic
NCT05083143 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncologic Outcomes of Testicular Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara Training and Research HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsTesticular Cancer, COVID-19ArmsCOVID-19 pandemic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Genitourinary malignancy among patients presenting with microscopic hematuria in Northwestern Ontario.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Outcomes and patient tolerability of radical inguinal orchiectomy under deep intravenous sedation.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Urology action plan in a pandemic.Singapore medical journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Reasons behind the Delayed Diagnosis of Testicular Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. The Impact of COVID-19 on New Kidney Cancer Diagnosis: Stage and Treatment in Northern Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Christopher J D WallisDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Giacomo NovaraDepartment of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology-Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Laura MarandinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Axel BexRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Ashish M KamatDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Todd M MorganDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nicolas MottetDepartment of Urology, University hospital Nord, St Etienne, France.
Silke GillessenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Alberto BossiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Morgan RoupretUrology, GRC n°5, PREDICTIVE ONCO-URO, AP-HP, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; European Section of Onco Urology, EAU.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Center, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Andrea NecchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
James W F CattoAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: j.catto@sheffield.ac.uk.
Zachary KlaassenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Augusta University-Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA; Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address: zklaassen19@gmail.com.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITAugusta University · USEuropean Association of Urology · NLInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRMayo Clinic in Arizona · USQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversità della Svizzera italiana · CHUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Sheffield · GBVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is leading to delays in the treatment of many urologic cancers.

objectiveTo provide a contemporary picture of the risks from delayed treatment for urologic cancers to assist with triage. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A collaborative review using literature published as of April 2, 2020. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Patients with low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are unlikely to suffer from a 3-6-month delay. Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer are at risk of disease progression, with radical cystectomy delays beyond 12 wk from diagnosis or completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prioritization of these patients for surgery or management with radiochemotherapy is encouraged. Active surveillance should be used for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Treatment of most patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa can be deferred 3-6 mo without change in outcomes. The same may be true for cancers with the highest risk of progression. With radiotherapy, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care. For surgery, although the added value of neoadjuvant ADT is questionable, it may be considered if a patient is interested in such an approach. Intervention may be safely deferred for T1/T2 renal masses, while locally advanced renal tumors (≥T3) should be treated expeditiously. Patients with metastatic renal cancer may consider vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy over immunotherapy. Risks for delay in the treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer depend on grade and stage. For patients with high-grade disease, delays of 12 wk in nephroureterectomy are not associated with adverse survival outcomes. Expert guidance recommends expedient local treatment of testis cancer. In penile cancer, adverse outcomes have been observed with delays of ≥3 mo before inguinal lymphadenectomy. Limitations include a paucity of data and methodologic variations for many cancers.

conclusionsPatients and clinicians should consider the oncologic risk of delayed cancer intervention versus the risks of COVID-19 to the patient, treating health care professionals, and the health care system. PATIENT SUMMARY: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to delays in the treatment of patients with urologic malignancies. Based on a review of the literature, patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma, advanced kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and penile cancer should be prioritized for treatment during these challenging times.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusDisease ManagementPandemicsCombined Modality TherapyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPneumonia, ViralRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Time-to-TreatmentTriageUrogenital NeoplasmsBladder cancerCoronavirusCoronavirus disease 2019Delayed treatmentKidney cancerPenile cancerProstate cancerSstemic therapySurgeryTesticular cancerUpper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32414626
PMCPMC7196384
OpenAlexW3022324286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.