Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414530›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2020

Transitions in Brain Evolution: Space, Time and Entropy.

Kate J Jeffery, Carlo Rovelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Arrow of Time, Entropy, and Protein Folding: Holistic View on Biochirality.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Entropy for the Brain and Applied Computation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Entropy and the Brain: An Overview.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate J JefferyInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK. Electronic address: k.jeffery@ucl.ac.uk.
Carlo RovelliAix-Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, 13288 Marseille, France; Perimeter Institute, 31 Caroline Street North, Waterloo N2L 2Y5, Canada; The Rotman Institute of Philosophy, 1151 Richmond St. N, London N6A 5B7, Canada.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How did brains evolve to become so complex, and what is their future? Brains pose an explanatory challenge because entropy, which inexorably increases over time, is commonly associated with disorder and simplicity. Recently we showed how evolution is an entropic process, building structures - organisms - which themselves facilitate entropy growth. Here we suggest that key transitional points in evolution extended organisms' reach into space and time, opening channels into new regions of a complex multidimensional state space that also allow entropy to increase. Brain evolution enabled representation of space and time, which vastly enhances this process. Some of these channels lead to tiny, dead-ends in the state space: the persistence of complex life is thus not thermodynamically guaranteed.

Indexed as

BrainEntropyHumansbraincomplexityentropyevolutionfree energyspacestate space

Identifiers

PMID32414530
PMCPMC7183980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.