Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414425›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2020

Temporary interruption of baricitinib: characterization of interruptions and effect on clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Paul Emery, Yoshiya Tanaka, Tracy Cardillo, Douglas Schlichting, Terence Rooney, Scott Beattie, Cameron Helt, Josef S Smolen

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01710358 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2012 to 2015Enrolled1,307ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsAdalimumab, Baricitinib, Methotrexate, Adalimumab Placebo, Baricitinib Placebo
NCT01711359 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had Limited or No Treatment With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2012 to 2015Enrolled588ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsBaricitinib, Methotrexate, Baricitinib Placebo, MTX Placebo, Folic Acid
NCT01721044 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2013 to 2014Enrolled527ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsPlacebo, Baricitinib, cDMARD
NCT01721057 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Patients With Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2012 to 2014Enrolled684ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsPlacebo, Baricitinib, cDMARD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Glycyrrhizic acid modifiedFrontiers in chemistry · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Effectiveness and safety of methotrexateTherapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Paul EmeryLeeds Muscoloskeletal Biomedical Research Centre/Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Rd, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. P.Emery@leeds.ac.uk.
Yoshiya TanakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Tracy CardilloEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Douglas SchlichtingEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Terence RooneyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Scott BeattieEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Cameron HeltEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Josef S SmolenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USChapel Allerton Hospital · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical practice, temporary interruption of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy is common for various reasons including side effects, non-compliance, or necessity for surgery. To characterize temporary interruptions of baricitinib and placebo-matched tablets in phase 3 studies of patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and describe their impact on efficacy and safety.

methodsDuring 4 baricitinib phase 3 studies, investigators documented timing, reason, and duration of investigator-initiated temporary interruptions of study drug. In 2 studies, patients recorded RA symptoms in daily diaries for 12 weeks. Post hoc analyses investigated changes in symptom scores during interruptions and resumption of treatment. Interruptions were evaluated for reoccurrence of adverse events or laboratory abnormalities after retreatment.

resultsAcross the placebo-controlled studies, interruptions occurred in larger proportions of baricitinib- (2 mg, 18%; 4 mg, 18%) vs placebo-treated (9%) patients in only one study (bDMARD-inadequate responder patients, RA-BEACON). In the active comparator-controlled studies, the lowest rates of interruption were in the baricitinib monotherapy arm (9%) of RA-BEGIN (vs methotrexate monotherapy or combination therapy), and proportions were similar for baricitinib (10%) and adalimumab (9%) in RA-BEAM. Adverse events were the most common reason for interruption, but their reoccurrence after drug restart was infrequent. Most interruptions lasted ≤ 2 weeks. Daily diaries indicated modest symptom increases during interruption with return to pre-interruption levels or better after resumption. Interruptions had no impact on long-term efficacy outcomes.

conclusionsConsistent with its pharmacologic properties, brief interruptions of baricitinib during phase 3 studies were associated with minor increases in RA symptoms that resolved following retreatment. This analysis provides useful information for clinicians, as temporary interruption of antirheumatic therapy is common in the care of patients with RA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01710358, NCT01711359, NCT01721057, NCT01721044.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleHumansPurinesPyrazolesSeverity of Illness IndexSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesbaricitinibPurinesPyrazolesSulfonamidesDMARDs (biologics)Drug interruptionJAK inhibitorsRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32414425
PMCPMC7227095
OpenAlexW3027163160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.