ArticleArthritis research & therapy2020
The promise, perceptions, and pitfalls of immunoassays for autoantibody testing in myositis.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical performance of commercial myositis-specific autoantibody tests evaluated against immunoprecipitation assays as a reference standard: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Pooled it
- Predictors of response to intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with dermatomyositis: the ProDERM study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Trial
- Autoantibodies associated with primary biliary cholangitis are common among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus even in the absence of elevated liver enzymes.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021Trial
- Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: An EASI survey on current clinical and laboratory practices.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Article
- Autoantibodies as biomarkers of cancer risk in dermatomyositis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Review
- Item selection for the development and validation of a revised classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: MyoROC project.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Article
- Expert Perspective: Diagnostic Approach to Differentiating Juvenile Dermatomyositis From Muscular Dystrophy.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome: Analysis From the Classification Criteria for Anti-Synthetase Syndrome Project.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Predictive value of myositis antibodies: role of semiquantitative classification and positivity for more than one autoantibody.RMD open · 2025Article
- An update on autoantibodies in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Performance of the 2017 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups: a scoping review.Clinical and experimental rheumatology · 2024Article
- Performance of cut-offs adjusted with positive control band intensity in line-blot assays for myositis-specific antibodies.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myositis: an update on pathophysiology and clinical care.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Subsets of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis Enriched for Contemporaneous Cancer Relative to the General Population.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Treatment escalation patterns to start biologics in refractory moderate juvenile dermatomyositis among members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2023Article
- Fine-tuning characterization of patients with interstitial pneumonia and an underlying autoimmune disease in real-world practice: We get closer with Nailfold videocapillaroscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Longitudinal assessment of reactivity and affinity profile of anti-Jo1 autoantibodies to distinct HisRS domains and a splice variant in a cohort of patients with myositis and anti-synthetase syndrome.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Article
- The origins, evolution and future of the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS).Clinical and experimental rheumatology · 2022Article
- Positioning of myositis-specific and associated autoantibody (MSA/MAA) testing in disease criteria and routine diagnostic work-up.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2022Article
- Profiling of Myositis Specific Antibodies and Composite Scores as an Aid in the Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Myopathies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA myositis-specific autoantibody can now be identified in the majority of patients with myositis. They identify homogeneous patient subgroups and are key tools in developing a personalized approach to disease management. There is substantial clinical interest in exploiting myositis autoantibodies as biomarkers, and consequently, a large number of commercial assays have been developed for their detection. These assays are already in widespread clinical use. In order to better understand perceived concerns from the international myositis community in relation to the reliability of these assays and how they are being used, we conducted a survey of international myositis experts, all of whom were members of the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies group.
resultsWe collected data on the types of assay used, manufacturers, and the nature of the report provided by different laboratories and received 111 complete responses. Respondents also provided information on how they used the different assays, their confidence in the results, and how this influenced their clinical practice. Enzyme immunoassay/ELISA was the most popular assay method used worldwide followed by line blot. Line blot was the most popular method used in Europe. Despite concerns from over 80% of respondents regarding false-positive and false-negative results with the assay used by their laboratory, over 80% reported that the identification of a myositis autoantibody influenced their diagnostic confidence, the information they provided to a patient, and their recommended treatment.
conclusionsIn spite of ongoing concerns from the majority of users regarding the reliability of the results, myositis-specific autoantibody testing, using commercial immunoassays, is being used globally to inform clinical decision-making. These findings highlight the need for urgent guidance on the use of myositis autoantibody testing and on the interpretation of results. Knowledge of the reliability of currently available assays is essential given the importance already placed on myositis-specific autoantibodies as clinical decision-making tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.