Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414391›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2020

Prognostic significance of baseline T cells, B cells and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in recurrent ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Jon Røikjær Henriksen, Line Nederby, Frede Donskov, Marianne Waldstrøm, Parvin Adimi, Anders Jakobsen, Karina Dahl Steffensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic value of systemic inflammation response indexes obtained from the complete blood count in patients treated for advanced ovarian carcinoma in front line.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jon Røikjær HenriksenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. jon.henriksen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-5342
Line NederbyBiochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Frede DonskovDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marianne WaldstrømFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Parvin AdimiDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Anders JakobsenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Karina Dahl SteffensenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKVejle Sygehus · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiomarkers are needed to guide treatment decisions in recurrent ovarian cancer, as a high proportion of patients do not benefit from treatments. Data on immune subsets in patients receiving chemotherapy are scarce. We investigated the impact of T cells, B cells, neutrophils and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in ovarian cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.

methodsBlood samples were collected prospectively at baseline in recurrent ovarian cancer (N = 72) receiving chemotherapy. T cells, B cells, neutrophils, and NLR were analyzed. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and treatment response, respectively. Cut-offs for T and B cells were predefined.

resultsIn patients with low vs. high T and B cells counts, OS was 6.1 months vs 12.0 months (P = 0.017) and 6.1 months vs 12.0 months (P = 0.011, respectively. Low T and B cells analyzed as continuous variables were also associated with unfavorable OS, P = 0.011 and P = 0.007, respectively. Neutrophils had no significant prognostic impact. Median NLR was 4.1. High vs. low NLR was associated with poor survival, 7.4 months vs. 15.9 months (P = 0.012). In multivariate analysis including platinum sensitivity, number of prior lines of chemotherapy, and performance status, high NLR remained an independent poor prognostic factor HR: 2.17 (95% CI 1.21-3.88) (P = 0.009). High NLR was also significantly associated with lack of response, OR 0.15 (95% CI: 0.04-0.51) (P = 0.002).

conclusionIn recurrent ovarian cancer patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy, low T and B lymphocyte counts had an unfavorable prognostic impact. High NLR was associated with lack of response and a poor prognosis, and the parameter may be used in patient counselling and treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overB-LymphocytesFemaleHumansLymphocytesMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeutrophilsOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesT-LymphocytesB cellsNeutrophilsNLROvarian cancerT cells

Identifiers

PMID32414391
PMCPMC7229632
OpenAlexW3027729120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.