Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414331›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2020

Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) - evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial.

Nico Schneider, Anna Bäcker, Katja Brenk-Franz, Christian Keinki, Jutta Hübner, Florian Brandt, Geraldine von der Winkel, Lutz Hager, Bernhard Strauss, Uwe Altmann

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A web-based knowledge database to provide evidence-based information to cancer patients: Utilization within the PIKKO study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology: Results and learnings from the PIKKO study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nico SchneiderInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystrasse 3, 07740, Jena, Germany. nico.schneider@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7612-550X
Anna BäckerInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystrasse 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Katja Brenk-FranzInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystrasse 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Christian KeinkiGerman Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany.
Jutta HübnerDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Florian BrandtIKK Südwest, Berliner Promenade 1, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Geraldine von der WinkelIKK Südwest, Berliner Promenade 1, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Lutz Hagerze:roPraxen, Bodelschwinghstrasse 10/3, 68723, Schwetzingen, Germany.
Bernhard StraussInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystrasse 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Uwe AltmannInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystrasse 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEFischer (Germany) · DE

Funding

Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee 01NVF17011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation.

methodsThe study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models. DISCUSSION: If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs.

trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register under DRKS00016703 (21.02.2019, the reason for the delay was the prioritization of the study management in the first year to establish the new approach into practice). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016703.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyQuality of LifeGermanyHumansMedical OncologyMulticenter Studies as TopicNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerCommunicationHealth competenceInformationOncological knowledge databaseOncologyPatient navigatorQuality of lifeSelf-efficacySpecialized oncological counseling

Identifiers

PMID32414331
PMCPMC7227332
OpenAlexW3028539501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.