Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414321›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

CIPR: a web-based R/shiny app and R package to annotate cell clusters in single cell RNA sequencing experiments.

H Atakan Ekiz, Christopher J Conley, W Zac Stephens, Ryan M O'Connell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. celltypeEnrich: a consensus-based scRNA-seq cluster annotation tool.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H Atakan EkizDivision of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 15 N. Medical Dr. East, JMRB, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. atakan.ekiz@path.utah.edu.
Christopher J ConleyBioinformatics Shared Resource, Hunstman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
W Zac StephensDivision of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 15 N. Medical Dr. East, JMRB, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Ryan M O'ConnellDivision of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 15 N. Medical Dr. East, JMRB, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. ryan.oconnell@path.utah.edu.
Huntsman Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Investigating the transfer of miRNAs by exosomes during inflammationR01AI123106 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI O'CONNELL, RYAN M · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Micro RNAs and chronic, low-grade inflammationR01AG047956 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI O'CONNELL, RYAN M · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123106NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047956NIH HHS R01-AG047956NIH HHS R01-AI123106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) has provided invaluable insights into cellular heterogeneity and functional states in health and disease. During the analysis of scRNAseq data, annotating the biological identity of cell clusters is an important step before downstream analyses and it remains technically challenging. The current solutions for annotating single cell clusters generally lack a graphical user interface, can be computationally intensive or have a limited scope. On the other hand, manually annotating single cell clusters by examining the expression of marker genes can be subjective and labor-intensive. To improve the quality and efficiency of annotating cell clusters in scRNAseq data, we present a web-based R/Shiny app and R package, Cluster Identity PRedictor (CIPR), which provides a graphical user interface to quickly score gene expression profiles of unknown cell clusters against mouse or human references, or a custom dataset provided by the user. CIPR can be easily integrated into the current pipelines to facilitate scRNAseq data analysis.

resultsCIPR employs multiple approaches for calculating the identity score at the cluster level and can accept inputs generated by popular scRNAseq analysis software. CIPR provides 2 mouse and 5 human reference datasets, and its pipeline allows inter-species comparisons and the ability to upload a custom reference dataset for specialized studies. The option to filter out lowly variable genes and to exclude irrelevant reference cell subsets from the analysis can improve the discriminatory power of CIPR suggesting that it can be tailored to different experimental contexts. Benchmarking CIPR against existing functionally similar software revealed that our algorithm is less computationally demanding, it performs significantly faster and provides accurate predictions for multiple cell clusters in a scRNAseq experiment involving tumor-infiltrating immune cells.

conclusionsCIPR facilitates scRNAseq data analysis by annotating unknown cell clusters in an objective and efficient manner. Platform independence owing to Shiny framework and the requirement for a minimal programming experience allows this software to be used by researchers from different backgrounds. CIPR can accurately predict the identity of a variety of cell clusters and can be used in various experimental contexts across a broad spectrum of research areas.

Indexed as

InternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsBase SequenceCell AggregationCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticHumansMiceCluster analysisGene expression profilingIdentity predictionImmune cellsSimilaritySingle cell RNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32414321
PMCPMC7227235
OpenAlexW3028505928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.