Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414320›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020

Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for prediction of genotypic values.

Giel H H van Bergen, Pascal Duenk, Cornelis A Albers, Piter Bijma, Mario P L Calus, Yvonne C J Wientjes, Hilbert J Kappen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giel H H van BergenSNN Machine Learning Group, Biophysics Department, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. g.vanbergen@science.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-5298
Pascal DuenkAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A AlbersDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Yvonne C J WientjesAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hilbert J KappenSNN Machine Learning Group, Biophysics Department, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 14291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating the genetic component of a complex phenotype is a complicated problem, mainly because there are many allele effects to estimate from a limited number of phenotypes. In spite of this difficulty, linear methods with variable selection have been able to give good predictions of additive effects of individuals. However, prediction of non-additive genetic effects is challenging with the usual prediction methods. In machine learning, non-additive relations between inputs can be modeled with neural networks. We developed a novel method (NetSparse) that uses Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for the prediction of genotypic values of individuals, including non-additive genetic effects.

resultsWe simulated several populations with different phenotypic models and compared NetSparse to genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), BayesB, their dominance variants, and an additive by additive method. We found that when the number of QTL was relatively small (10 or 100), NetSparse had 2 to 28 percentage points higher accuracy than the reference methods. For scenarios that included dominance or epistatic effects, NetSparse had 0.0 to 3.9 percentage points higher accuracy for predicting phenotypes than the reference methods, except in scenarios with extreme overdominance, for which reference methods that explicitly model dominance had 6 percentage points higher accuracy than NetSparse.

conclusionsBayesian neural networks with variable selection are promising for prediction of the genetic component of complex traits in animal breeding, and their performance is robust across different genetic models. However, their large computational costs can hinder their use in practice.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAlgorithmsAllelesAnimalsBayes TheoremForecastingGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenomicsGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID32414320
PMCPMC7227313
OpenAlexW3024211197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.