ArticleMicroorganisms2020
Effect of Co-Inoculation of
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- β-Glucosidase Activity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Volatilomics of Fruit Wines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Yeast Starter Culture Identification to Produce of Red Wines with Enhanced Antioxidant Content.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transforming Spent Coffee Grounds' Hydrolysates with YeastFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quality Improvement in Apple Ciders during Simultaneous Co-Fermentation through Triple Mixed-Cultures ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Malolactic Fermentation: New Approaches to Old Problems.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Microbial Interaction between Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transcriptome Level Mechanism of Cell-Cell Antagonism.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Effects of Purified β-Glucosidases fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- What IsMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Pilot-Scale Vinification of Cabernet Sauvignon Using CombinedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Traditional Fermented Foods from Ecuador: A Review with a Focus on Microbial Diversity.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Combined Use ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Microbial Dynamics in Wine Production.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Yeast Fermentation at Low Temperatures: Adaptation to Changing Environmental Conditions and Formation of Volatile Compounds.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Influence of Non-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Effects of CrudeMicroorganisms · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The employment of multi-species starter cultures has growing importance in modern winemaking for improving the complexity and wine attributes. The assessment of compatibility for selected species/strains at the industrial-scale is crucial to assure the quality and the safety associated with fermentations. An aspect particularly relevant when the species belong to non-Saccharomyces, Saccharomyces spp. and malolactic bacteria, three categories with different biological characteristics and oenological significance. To the best of our knowledge, the present report is the first study regarding the utilization of a combined starter culture composed of three strains of non-Saccharomyces, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum for production of wine at the industrial scale. More in-depth, this work investigated the oenological potential of the autochthonous characterized strains from the Apulian region (Southern Italy), Candida zemplinina (syn. Starmerella bacillaris) 35NC1, S. cerevisiae (NP103), and L. plantarum (LP44), in co-inoculation following a complete scale-up scheme. Microbial dynamics, fermentative profiles and production of volatile secondary compounds were assessed in lab-scale micro-vinification tests and then the performances of the mixed starter formulation were further evaluated by pilot-scale wine production. The above results were finally validated by performing an industrial-scale vinification on 100HL of Negroamaro cultivar grape must. The multi-starter formulation was able to rule the different stages of the fermentation processes effectively, and the different microbial combinations enhanced the organoleptic wine features to different extents. The findings indicated that the simultaneous inoculation of the three species affect the quality and quantity of several volatile compounds, confirming that the complexity of the wine can reflect the complexity of the starter cultures. Moreover, the results underlined that the same mixed culture could differently influence wine quality when tested at the lab-, pilot- and industrial-scale. Finally, we highlighted the significance of employment non-Saccharomyces and L. plantarum, together with S. cerevisiae, autochthonous strains in the design of custom-made starter culture formulation for typical regional wine production with pronounced unique quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.