Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32414013›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Government Intervention, Risk Perception, and the Adoption of Protective Action Recommendations: Evidence from the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Experience of China.

Taixiang Duan, Hechao Jiang, Xiangshu Deng, Qiongwen Zhang, Fang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
41.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Improving Hand Hygiene Behavior Using a Novel Theory-Based Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. International taxation sentiment and COVID-19 crisis.Research in international business and finance · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Public Risk Perception in China on the Intention to Use Sports APPs during COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taixiang DuanDepartment of Sociology, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hechao JiangResearch Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
Xiangshu DengResearch Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
Qiongwen ZhangResearch Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
Fang WangResearch Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics · CNHohai University · CN

Funding

Chengdu Social Science Fund 2019BS084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between government interventions, risk perception, and the public's adoption of protective action recommendations (PARs) during the COVID-19 coronavirus disease emergency in mainland China. We conducted quota sampling based on the proportion of the population in each province and gender ratios in the Sixth Census and obtained a sample size of 3837. Government intervention was divided into government communication, government prevention and control, and government rescue. We used multiple regression and a bootstrap mediation effect test to study the mechanism of these three forms of government intervention on the public's adoption of PARs. The results show that government prevention and control and government rescue significantly increased the likelihood of the public adopting PARs. Risk perception was significantly associated with the public's adoption of PARs. The effects of government interventions and risk perception on the public's adoption of PARs was not found to vary by region. Risk perception is identified as an important mediating factor between government intervention and the public's adoption of PARs. These results indicate that increasing the public's risk perception is an effective strategy for governments seeking to encourage the public to adopt PARs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

CoronavirusBetacoronavirusChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksGovernmentHumansMalePandemicsPerceptionPneumonia, ViralRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2adoption of PARsCOVID-19government interventionrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID32414013
PMCPMC7277925
OpenAlexW3025443954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.