ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2020
Mechanobiology of vertebrate gut morphogenesis.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Convergent flow-mediated mesenchymal force drives embryonic foregut constriction and splitting.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Elongation of the nascent avian foregut requires coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic cell behaviors.Developmental biology · 2025Article
- Convergent flow-mediated mesenchymal force drives embryonic foregut constriction and splitting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Material properties of the embryonic small intestine during buckling morphogenesis.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Mechanical state transitions in the regulation of tissue form and function.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024Review
- Elastic fibers define embryonic tissue stiffness to enable buckling morphogenesis of the small intestine.Biomaterials · 2023Article
- A chemo-mechanical model of endoderm movements driving elongation of the amniote hindgut.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- ELASTIC FIBERS DEFINE EMBRYONIC TISSUE STIFFNESS TO ENABLE BUCKLING MORPHOGENESIS OF THE SMALL INTESTINE.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A chemo-mechanical model of endoderm movements driving elongation of the amniote hindgut.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Mechanical stretching boosts expansion and regeneration of intestinal organoids through fueling stem cell self-renewal.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2022Article
- Maternal control of visceral asymmetry evolution in Astyanax cavefish.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately a century after D'Arcy Thompson's On Growth and Form, there continues to be widespread interest in the biophysical and mathematical basis of morphogenesis. Particularly over the past 20 years, this interest has led to great advances in our understanding of a broad range of processes in embryonic development through a quantitative, mechanically driven framework. Nowhere in vertebrate development is this more apparent than the development of endodermally derived organs. Here, we discuss recent advances in the study of gut development that have emerged primarily from mechanobiology-motivated approaches that span from gut tube morphogenesis and later organogenesis of the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.