Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32413810›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Subclinical paranoid beliefs and enhanced neural response during processing of unattractive faces.

Stephan Furger, Antje Stahnke, Francilia Zengaffinen, Andrea Federspiel, Yosuke Morishima, Martina Papmeyer, Roland Wiest, Thomas Dierks, Werner Strik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephan FurgerTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Antje StahnkeTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Francilia ZengaffinenTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Andrea FederspielTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Yosuke MorishimaTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Martina PapmeyerTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Roland WiestUniversity Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas DierksTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Werner StrikTranslational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: werner.strik@upd.unibe.ch.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of faces and consequent social inferences are fundamental for interpersonal communication. While facial expression is important for interindividual communication, constitutional and acquired features are crucial for basic emotions of attraction or repulsion. An emotional bias in face processing has been shown in schizophrenia, but the neurobiological mechanisms are unclear. Studies on the interaction between face processing and the emotional state of healthy individuals may help to elucidate the pathogenesis of the paranoid syndrome in psychosis. This study addressed facial attractiveness and paranoid ideas in a non-clinical population. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated neural activation patterns of 99 healthy subjects during the passive perception of a dynamic presentation of faces with different attractiveness. We found that the perceived attractiveness of faces was linked to the activity of face processing and limbic regions including the fusiform gyrus, amygdala, and prefrontal areas. Paranoid beliefs interacted with perceived attractiveness in these regions resulting in a higher response range and increased activation after the presentation of unattractive faces. However, no behavioral interactions between reported subjective attractiveness and paranoid beliefs were found. The results showed that increased activation of limbic brain regions is linked to paranoid beliefs. Since similar correlations were found in clinical populations with paranoid syndromes, we suggest a dimension of emotional dysregulation ranging from subclinical paranoid beliefs to paranoid schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultAmygdalaDynamic FacesFace PerceptionfMRIParanoid BeliefsSyNoPsis

Identifiers

PMID32413810
PMCPMC7226880
OpenAlexW3017843800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.