ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Minimally invasive mesh salvaging technique on treatment of hernia mesh infection: A case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the presentation is to demonstrate a new conservative approach for the salvage treatment of the infected hernia mesh.
methodsThree patients with polypropylene mesh infection following an open umbilical and incisional hernia repair performed by placing the mesh in the onlay position are presented. The infection manifested itself with a systemic inflammatory response and an infected fluid collection surrounding the mesh. All patients were treated conservatively by a minimally invasive technique according to the stepwise protocol.
resultsAn effective, rapid response to the conservative treatment was observed. A total of five to six procedures were necessary in a period of up to twenty days. Mesh salvage was achieved, and the long-term outcome demonstrates neither the recurrence of infection nor hernia. An enclosed space at the infection site is the main precondition for providing a sufficient concentration of the antiseptic for a long enough time to act effectively at the infection site. The fast killing effect on the mesh infection and a good long-term outcome in all presented patients prove that this technique is superior to the the current techniques in appropriately selected patients from the point of treatment duration.
conclusionAn effective mesh salvaging conservative treatment is possible when the infection manifests itself as an infected fluid collection surrounding the monofilament, large-pore polypropylene mesh and should be the first-line option. Open surgical approach should be reserved as a second-line option if the first fails.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.