Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32413679›Full record

ReviewClinical psychology review2020

Engagement in technology-enhanced interventions for children and adolescents: Current status and recommendations for moving forward.

A R Georgeson, April Highlander, Raelyn Loiselle, Chloe Zachary, Deborah J Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychology review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Technology-Enhanced BPT for Early-Onset Behavior Disorders: Improved Outcomes for Children With Co-Occurring Internalizing Symptoms.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Engagement in digital interventions.The American psychologist · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A R GeorgesonDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA. Electronic address: georgeson@unc.edu.
April HighlanderDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA.
Raelyn LoiselleDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA.
Chloe ZacharyDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA.
Deborah J JonesDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA. Electronic address: djjones@email.unc.edu.

Funding

Technology to Enhance Treatment for Early Conduct Problems in Low Income FamiliesR01MH100377 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONES, DEBORAH J · 2013 to 2016
$2.7M
Technology-Enhanced Delivery of Treatment for Early Conduct ProblemsR34MH082956 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONES, DEBORAH J · 2009 to 2011
$675k
The Role of Emotion Regulation and Socialization in BPT Efficiency and OutcomesR21MH113887 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONES, DEBORAH J · 2018 to 2021
$468k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100377NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH113887NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH082956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment engagement is a primary challenge to the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents. One solution to this challenge is technology, which has been proposed as an enhancement to or replacement for standard clinic-based, therapist delivered services. This review summarizes the current state of the field regarding technology's promise to enhance engagement. A review of this literature suggests that although the focus of much theoretical consideration, as well as funding priorities, relatively little empirical research has been published on the role of technology as a vehicle to enhance engagement in particular. Moreover, lack of consistency in constructs, design, and measures make it difficult to draw useful comparisons across studies and, in turn, to determine if and what progress has been made toward more definitive conclusions. At this point in the literature, we can say only that we do not yet definitively know if technology does (or does not) enhance engagement in evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents. Recommendations are provided with the hope of more definitively assessing technology's capacity to improve engagement, including more studies explicitly designed to assess this research question, as well as greater consistency across studies in the measurement of and designs used to test engagement.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeInternet-Based InterventionMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareTelemedicineTherapy, Computer-AssistedAdolescentChildHumansMental DisordersAdolescentChildEngagementTechnology

Identifiers

PMID32413679
PMCPMC7371153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.