ReviewMuscle & nerve2020
The future of upper extremity rehabilitation robotics: research and practice.
Review in Muscle & nerve, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residual muscle activity associated with phantom limb movements after transhumeral amputation without surgical reinnervation: a preliminary ultrasound study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Preliminary Investigation of Myoelectric Control of an Assistive Neck Exoskeleton by Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Toward Natural Limb Function: A New Era in Prosthetic Innovation.Annals of neurology · 2025Review
- Design, development and evaluation of registry software for upper limb disabilities.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted repair of peripheral nerve injury: a new research hotspot and associated challenges.Neural regeneration research · 2024Article
- Merging Humans and Neuroprosthetics through Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2024Review
- First Demonstration of Functional Task Performance Using a Sonomyographic Prosthesis: A Case Study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Clinical Basis for Creating an Osseointegrated Neural Interface.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021Review
- The Need to Work Arm in Arm: Calling for Collaboration in Delivering Neuroprosthetic Limb Replacements.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The loss of upper limb motor function can have a devastating effect on people's lives. To restore upper limb control and functionality, researchers and clinicians have developed interfaces to interact directly with the human body's motor system. In this invited review, we aim to provide details on the peripheral nerve interfaces and brain-machine interfaces that have been developed in the past 30 years for upper extremity control, and we highlight the challenges that still remain to transition the technology into the clinical market. The findings show that peripheral nerve interfaces and brain-machine interfaces have many similar characteristics that enable them to be concurrently developed. Decoding neural information from both interfaces may lead to novel physiological models that may one day fully restore upper limb motor function for a growing patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.