Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32413119›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2020

Clinical, molecular, and radiomic profile of gliomas with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions.

Anna Luisa Di Stefano, Alberto Picca, Edouard Saragoussi, Franck Bielle, Francois Ducray, Chiara Villa, Marica Eoli, Rosina Paterra, Luisa Bellu, Bertrand Mathon and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diffuse glioma withRadiology case reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Diffuse Gliomas withCancers · 2024
    Review
  14. RT-PCR assay to detectNeuro-oncology practice · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna Luisa Di StefanoInserm Unit 1127, Sorbonne University, Institute of the Brain and Spinal Cord, Paris, France.
Alberto PiccaC. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Edouard SaragoussiDepartment of Radiology, Adolphe de Rothschild Ophthalmological Foundation, Paris, France.
Franck BielleDepartment of Neuropathology, Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France.
Francois DucrayDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Civil Hospice of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Department of Cancer Cell Plasticity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Chiara VillaDepartment of Pathology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Marica EoliUnit of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Rosina PaterraUnit of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Luisa BelluDepartment of Neuropathology 2, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital,Paris, France.
Bertrand MathonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Laurent CapelleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Véronique BourgDepartment of Neurology, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice Côte D'Azur University, Nice, France.
Arnaud GloaguenSignals and Systems Laboratory, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Cathy PhilippeNeurospin, French Atomic Energy Commission, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Vincent FrouinNeurospin, French Atomic Energy Commission, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Yohann SchmittInserm Unit 1127, Sorbonne University, Institute of the Brain and Spinal Cord, Paris, France.
Julie LerondInserm Unit 1127, Sorbonne University, Institute of the Brain and Spinal Cord, Paris, France.
Julie LeclercInserm Unit 1127, Sorbonne University, Institute of the Brain and Spinal Cord, Paris, France.
Anna LasorellaInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Antonio IavaroneInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Karima MokhtariDepartment of Neuropathology, Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France.
Julien SavatovskyDepartment of Radiology, Adolphe de Rothschild Ophthalmological Foundation, Paris, France.
Agusti AlentornInserm Unit 1127, Sorbonne University, Institute of the Brain and Spinal Cord, Paris, France.
Marc SansonInserm Unit 1127, Sorbonne University, Institute of the Brain and Spinal Cord, Paris, France.
TARGET study group
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRCancer Genetics (United States) · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITHôpital Foch · FRHôpital Pasteur · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActionable fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3)-transforming acidic coiled-coil protein 3 fusions (F3T3) are found in approximately 3% of gliomas, but their characteristics and prognostic significance are still poorly defined. Our goal was to characterize the clinical, radiological, and molecular profile of F3T3 positive diffuse gliomas.

methodsWe screened F3T3 fusion by real-time (RT)-PCR and FGFR3 immunohistochemistry in a large series of gliomas, characterized for main genetic alterations, histology, and clinical evolution. We performed a radiological and radiomic case control study, using an exploratory and a validation cohort.

resultsWe screened 1162 diffuse gliomas (951 unselected cases and 211 preselected for FGFR3 protein immunopositivity), identifying 80 F3T3 positive gliomas. F3T3 was mutually exclusive with IDH mutation (P < 0.001) and EGFR amplification (P = 0.01), defining a distinct molecular cluster associated with CDK4 (P = 0.04) and MDM2 amplification (P = 0.03). F3T3 fusion was associated with longer survival for the whole series and for glioblastomas (median overall survival was 31.1 vs 19.9 mo, P = 0.02) and was an independent predictor of better outcome on multivariate analysis.F3T3 positive gliomas had specific MRI features, affecting preferentially insula and temporal lobe, and with poorly defined tumor margins. F3T3 fusion was correctly predicted by radiomics analysis on both the exploratory (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87) and the validation MRI (AUC = 0.75) cohort. Using Cox proportional hazards models, radiomics predicted survival with a high C-index (0.75, SD 0.04), while the model combining clinical, genetic, and radiomic data showed the highest C-index (0.81, SD 0.04).

conclusionF3T3 positive gliomas have distinct molecular and radiological features, and better outcome.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3Young AdultFGFR3 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3TACC3 protein, humandiffuse gliomasF3T3 gene fusionslesion to symptom mappingVASARI features

Identifiers

PMID32413119
PMCPMC7690363
OpenAlexW2971407998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.