Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32413034›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A simple model for glioma grading based on texture analysis applied to conventional brain MRI.

José Gerardo Suárez-García, Javier Miguel Hernández-López, Eduardo Moreno-Barbosa, Benito de Celis-Alonso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Novel System for Precise Grading of Glioma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Gerardo Suárez-GarcíaFaculty of Physics and Mathematics, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Puebla, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-9161
Javier Miguel Hernández-LópezFaculty of Physics and Mathematics, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Puebla, México.
Eduardo Moreno-BarbosaFaculty of Physics and Mathematics, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Puebla, México.
Benito de Celis-AlonsoFaculty of Physics and Mathematics, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Puebla, México.
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy of glioma grading is fundamental for the diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis of patients. The purpose of this work was to develop a low-cost and easy-to-implement classification model which distinguishes low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from high-grade gliomas (HGGs), through texture analysis applied to conventional brain MRI. Different combinations of MRI contrasts (T1Gd and T2) and one segmented glioma region (necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core, NCR/NET) were studied. Texture features obtained from the gray level size zone matrix (GLSZM) were calculated. An under-sampling method was proposed to divide the data into different training subsets and subsequently extract complementary information for the creation of distinct classification models. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the models were calculated, and the best model explicitly reported. The best model included only three texture features and reached a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 94.12%, 88.24% and 91.18%, respectively. According to the features of the model, when the NCR/NET region was studied, HGGs had a more heterogeneous texture than LGGs in the T1Gd images, and LGGs had a more heterogeneous texture than HGGs in the T2 images. These novel results partially contrast with results from the literature. The best model proved to be useful for the classification of gliomas. Complementary results showed that the heterogeneity of gliomas depended on the MRI contrast studied. The chosen model stands out as a simple, low-cost, easy-to-implement, reproducible and highly accurate glioma classifier. Importantly, it should be accessible to populations with reduced economic and scientific resources.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Grading

Identifiers

PMID32413034
PMCPMC7228074
OpenAlexW3025607118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.