Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412953›Full record

ArticleMedical care2020

Using Electronic Health Records in Longitudinal Studies: Estimating Patient Attrition.

Nathalie Huguet, Jorge Kaufmann, Jean O'Malley, Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Jennifer E DeVoe, Miguel Marino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Video versus audio telehealth in safety net clinic patients: Changes by rurality and time.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Jorge KaufmannDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Jean O'MalleyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Heather AngierDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Megan HoopesOCHIN Inc.
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Oregon Health & Science University · USOchin · US

Funding

Evaluating Control of Hypertension - Effect of Social Determinants (ECHOES)R01HL136575 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
PREVENT-D: Post ACA Reform: Evaluate Community Health Center Care for DiabetesU18DP006116 · DP · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HUGUET, NATHALIE · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
ACCESS: Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionSR01CA204267 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Helping gEnerations Identify Risks (Heirs) to HealthR01HS025962 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
ACL HHS U18DP006116AHRQ HHS R01 HS025962NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006116NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204267NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) provide rich data on many domains not routinely available in other data, as such, they are a promising source to study changes in health outcomes using longitudinal study designs (eg, cohort studies, natural experiments, etc.). Yet, patient attrition rates in these data are unknown.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to estimate overall and among adults with diabetes or hypertension: (1) patient attrition over a 3-year period at community health centers; and (2) the likelihood that patients with Medicaid permanently switched their source of primary care. RESEARCH

designA retrospective cohort study of 2012-2017 data from the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network (ADVANCE) Clinical Data Research Network of community health centers were used to assess EHR data attrition. Oregon Medicaid enrollment and claims data were used to estimate the likelihood of changing the source of primary care. SUBJECTS: A total of 827,657 patients aged 19-64 with ≥1 ambulatory visit from 76 community health center systems across 20 states. In all, 232,891 Oregon Medicaid enrollees (aged 19-64) with a gap of ≥6 months following a claim for a visit billed to a primary care source. MEASURES: Percentage of patients not returning within 3 years of their qualifying visit (attrition). The probability that a patient with Medicaid permanently changed their primary care source.

resultsAttrition over the 3 years averaged 33.5%; attrition rates were lower (<25%) among patients with diabetes and/or hypertension. Among Medicaid enrollees, the percentage of provider change after a 6-month gap between visits was 12% for community health center patients compared with 39% for single-provider practice patients. Over 3 years, the likelihood of a patient changing to a new provider increased with length of time since their last visit but remained lowest among community health center patients.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the use of the EHR dataset is a reliable source of data to support longitudinal studies while highlighting variability in attrition by primary care source and chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Longitudinal StudiesAdultDiabetes MellitusElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32412953
PMCPMC7365658
OpenAlexW3025331148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.