Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412678›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Sensory-motor network topology in multiple sclerosis: Structural connectivity analysis accounting for intrinsic density discrepancy.

Simona Schiavi, Maria Petracca, Matteo Battocchio, Mohamed M El Mendili, Swetha Paduri, Lazar Fleysher, Matilde Inglese, Alessandro Daducci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A multi-compartment model for pathological connectomes.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Classification of multiple sclerosis patients based on structural disconnection: A robust feature selection approach.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona SchiaviDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1641-186X
Maria PetraccaDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-2769
Matteo BattocchioDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mohamed M El MendiliDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Swetha PaduriDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Lazar FleysherDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Matilde IngleseDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9610-0297
Alessandro DaducciDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4677-6678
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Verona · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph theory and network modelling have been previously applied to characterize motor network structural topology in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, between-group differences disclosed by graph analysis might be primarily driven by discrepancy in density, which is likely to be reduced in pathologic conditions as a consequence of macroscopic damage and fibre loss that may result in less streamlines properly traced. In this work, we employed the convex optimization modelling for microstructure informed tractography (COMMIT) framework, which, given a tractogram, estimates the actual contribution (or weight) of each streamline in order to optimally explain the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging signal, filtering out those that are implausible or not necessary. Then, we analysed the topology of this 'COMMIT-weighted sensory-motor network' in MS accounting for network density. By comparing with standard connectivity analysis, we also tested if abnormalities in network topology are still identifiable when focusing on more 'quantitative' network properties. We found that topology differences identified with standard tractography in MS seem to be mainly driven by density, which, in turn, is strongly influenced by the presence of lesions. We were able to identify a significant difference in density but also in network global and local properties when accounting for density discrepancy. Therefore, we believe that COMMIT may help characterize the structural organization in pathological conditions, allowing a fair comparison of connectomes which considers discrepancies in network density. Moreover, discrepancy-corrected network properties are clinically meaningful and may help guide prognosis assessment and treatment choice.

Indexed as

AdultDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveNerve NetPrefrontal CortexSensorimotor CortexCOMMITdiffusion MRIgraph theorymotor networkmultiple sclerosisstructural connectivitytractography

Identifiers

PMID32412678
PMCPMC7336144
OpenAlexW3024043145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.