Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412556›Full record

ArticleChaos, solitons, and fractals2020

Characterization of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of uncertainties, mitigation strategies, and underreporting of cases in South Korea, Italy, and Brazil.

Ruy Freitas Reis, Bárbara de Melo Quintela, Joventino de Oliveira Campos, Johnny Moreira Gomes, Bernardo Martins Rocha, Marcelo Lobosco, Rodrigo Weber Dos Santos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos, solitons, and fractals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Bridging the gap between models based on ordinary, delayed, and fractional differentials equations through integral kernels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 mortality in Brazil, 2020-21: consequences of the pandemic inadequate management.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruy Freitas ReisDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Bárbara de Melo QuintelaDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Joventino de Oliveira CamposCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas de Gerais, Leopoldina, Brazil.
Johnny Moreira GomesPós-Graduação em Modelagem Computacional, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Bernardo Martins RochaDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Marcelo LoboscoDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Rodrigo Weber Dos SantosDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRFederal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By April 7th, 2020, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected one and a half million people worldwide, accounting for over 80 thousand of deaths in 209 countries and territories around the world. The new and fast dynamics of the pandemic are challenging the health systems of different countries. In the absence of vaccines or effective treatments, mitigation policies, such as social isolation and lock-down of cities, have been adopted, but the results vary among different countries. Some countries were able to control the disease at the moment, as is the case of South Korea. Others, like Italy, are now experiencing the peak of the pandemic. Finally, countries with emerging economies and social issues, like Brazil, are in the initial phase of the pandemic. In this work, we use mathematical models with time-dependent coefficients, techniques of inverse and forward uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis to characterize essential aspects of the COVID-19 in the three countries mentioned above. The model parameters estimated for South Korea revealed effective social distancing and isolation policies, border control, and a high number in the percentage of reported cases. In contrast, underreporting of cases was estimated to be very high in Brazil and Italy. In addition, the model estimated a poor isolation policy at the moment in Brazil, with a reduction of contact around 40%, whereas Italy and South Korea estimated numbers for contact reduction are at 75% and 90%, respectively. This characterization of the COVID-19, in these different countries under different scenarios and phases of the pandemic, supports the importance of mitigation policies, such as social distancing. In addition, it raises serious concerns for socially and economically fragile countries, where underreporting poses additional challenges to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic by significantly increasing the uncertainties regarding its dynamics.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemiologyMathematical modelingSensitivity analysisUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID32412556
PMCPMC7221372
OpenAlexW3025036455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.