Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412522›Full record

ArticleEnvironment systems & decisions2020

COVID, resilience, and the built environment.

Jesse M Keenan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment systems & decisions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Work from home in the post-COVID world.Case studies on transport policy · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Privacy and housing: research perspectives based on a systematic literature review.Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19, the Built Environment, and Health.Environmental health perspectives · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The intersection of climate change with the era of COVID-19.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2021
    Review
  16. Living in a Multi-Risk Chaotic Condition: Pandemic, Natural Hazards and Complex Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jesse M KeenanSchool of Architecture, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-1682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a perspective on the reciprocal relationships between public and private sector resilience planning activities and the ongoing COVID responses in the U.S. Through the lens of the built environment, this article provides selected insights into how various disaster, organizational, and engineering resilience activities have likely positively shaped COVID responses within the healthcare sector. These positive influences are contextualized within extensive efforts within public health and healthcare management to calibrate community resilience frameworks and practices for utilization in everything from advancing community health to the continuity of facilities operations. Thereafter, the article shifts focus to speculate on how ongoing experiences under COVID might yield positive impacts for future resilience designs, plans and policies within housing and the built environment. Through this perspective, the article hopes to explore those often overlooked aspects of the physical and social parameters of the built environment that may be understood as providing opportunities to inform future disaster, public health, and climate change preparations and responses.

Indexed as

Built environmentCommunity resilienceCOVID-19Disaster resilienceHousingResilience

Identifiers

PMID32412522
PMCPMC7220848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.