Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412414›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Public Engagement and Government Responsiveness in the Communications About COVID-19 During the Early Epidemic Stage in China: Infodemiology Study on Social Media Data.

Qiuyan Liao, Jiehu Yuan, Meihong Dong, Lin Yang, Richard Fielding, Wendy Wing Tak Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How Portuguese Health Entities Used Social Media to Face the Public Health Emergency during COVID-19 Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Social media mining under the COVID-19 context: Progress, challenges, and opportunities.International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal · 2022
    Article
  18. What Drives Elderly People in China Away from COVID-19 Information?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiuyan Liao *School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-1105-6857
Jiehu Yuan *School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-3429-8514
Meihong Dong *School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-2882-9809
Lin YangSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-3233
Richard FieldingSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-7017
Wendy Wing Tak LamSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-0149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective risk communication about the outbreak of a newly emerging infectious disease in the early stage is critical for managing public anxiety and promoting behavioral compliance. China has experienced the unprecedented epidemic of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in an era when social media has fundamentally transformed information production and consumption patterns.

objectiveThis study examined public engagement and government responsiveness in the communications about COVID-19 during the early epidemic stage based on an analysis of data from Sina Weibo, a major social media platform in China.

methodsWeibo data relevant to COVID-19 from December 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020, were retrieved. Engagement data (likes, comments, shares, and followers) of posts from government agency accounts were extracted to evaluate public engagement with government posts online. Content analyses were conducted for a random subset of 644 posts from personal accounts of individuals, and 273 posts from 10 relatively more active government agency accounts and the National Health Commission of China to identify major thematic contents in online discussions. Latent class analysis further explored main content patterns, and chi-square for trend examined how proportions of main content patterns changed by time within the study time frame.

resultsThe public response to COVID-19 seemed to follow the spread of the disease and government actions but was earlier for Weibo than the government. Online users generally had low engagement with posts relevant to COVID-19 from government agency accounts. The common content patterns identified in personal and government posts included sharing epidemic situations; general knowledge of the new disease; and policies, guidelines, and official actions. However, personal posts were more likely to show empathy to affected people (χ

conclusionsThe government should closely monitor social media data to improve the timing of communications about an epidemic. As the epidemic evolves, merely sharing situation updates and policies may be insufficient to capture public interest in the messages. The government may adopt a more empathic communication style as more people are affected by the disease to address public concerns.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCommunicationCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAnxietyChinaCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksEmotionsGovernmentHumansSARS-CoV-2Social Mediacontent analysisCOVID-19epidemicinfectious diseaseoutbreakpandemicrisk communicationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID32412414
PMCPMC7284407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.