Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412068›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2020

Home Health Use Following a Cancer Diagnosis Among Patients Enrolled in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare: Findings From the Newly Linked SEER-Medicare and Home Health OASIS Data.

Kali S Thomas, Margot L Schwartz, Eric Boyd, Dolly P White, Angela B Mariotto, Michael J Barrett, Joan L Warren

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Updated Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Enhanced Content and Applications.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kali S ThomasCenter of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Margot L SchwartzDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Eric BoydInformation Management Services, Inc, Calverton, MD, USA.
Dolly P WhiteNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Angela B MariottoNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael J BarrettInformation Management Services, Inc, Calverton, MD, USA.
Joan L WarrenNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USInformation Management Services · USBrown University · USProvidence College · US

Funding

Evaluating Cash Benefit Programs for Veterans' Long Term CareIK2HX001775 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI THOMAS, KALI ST. MARIE · 2020 to 2021
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX001775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article describes characteristics of patients receiving home health following an initial cancer diagnosis, comparing those enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM), using the newly linked 2010-2014 National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare and home health Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data.

methodsWe identified SEER-Medicare beneficiaries with at least one OASIS assessment within 3 months of cancer diagnosis in 2010-2014, and summarized their demographic and clinical characteristics. Demographic and diagnostic data were obtained from the SEER-Medicare data, while further details about cognitive status, mood, function, and medical history were obtained from OASIS. We assessed differences between MA and TM beneficiaries using chi-square tests for independence, t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESUTLS: We identified 104 023 patients who received home health within 3 months of cancer diagnosis: 81 587 enrolled in TM and 22 436 enrolled in MA. TM cancer patients had higher unadjusted rates of home health use than MA patients (16.3% vs 10.3%, P < .001). TM cancer patients receiving home health had more limitations in their cognitive function than their MA counterparts and longer lengths of service (mean = 42.2 days vs 39.4 days, P < .001; median = 27 vs 26 days, interquartile range = 42).

conclusionThis study demonstrates the large number of cancer patients in the SEER-Medicare-OASIS data and describes characteristics for TM and MA patients. These newly linked data can be used to assess home health care among older patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesMedicare Part CNeoplasmsSEER ProgramAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32412068
PMCPMC7225660
OpenAlexW3028390892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.