Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32412016›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2018

A Natural Language Interface for Dissemination of Reproducible Biomedical Data Science.

Rogers Jeffrey Leo John, Jignesh M Patel, Andrew L Alexander, Vikas Singh, Nagesh Adluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rogers Jeffrey Leo JohnUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Jignesh M PatelUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Andrew L AlexanderUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Vikas SinghUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Nagesh AdluruUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.

Funding

TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POLLAK, SETH D · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Manifold-valued statistical models for longitudinal morphometic analysis in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD)R01EB022883 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C, SINGH, VIKAS · 2016 to 2018
$995k
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022883NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational tools in the form of software packages are burgeoning in the field of medical imaging and biomedical research. These tools enable biomedical researchers to analyze a variety of data using modern machine learning and statistical analysis techniques. While these publicly available software packages are a great step towards a multiplicative increase in the biomedical research productivity, there are still many open issues related to validation and reproducibility of the results. A key gap is that while scientists can validate domain insights that are implicit in the analysis, the analysis itself is coded in a programming language and that domain scientist may not be a programmer. Thus, there is no/limited direct validation of the program that carries out the desired analysis. We propose a novel solution, building upon recent successes in natural language understanding, to address this problem. Our platform allows researchers to perform, share, reproduce and interpret the analysis pipelines and results via natural language. While this approach still requires users to have a conceptual understanding of the techniques, it removes the burden of programming syntax and thus lowers the barriers to advanced and reproducible neuroimaging and biomedical research.

Indexed as

Natural language user interfaceNeuro/medical·image analysisProvenance trackingReproducibilitySurgical data scienceSystems

Identifiers

PMID32412016
PMCPMC7224401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.