ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2018
A Natural Language Interface for Dissemination of Reproducible Biomedical Data Science.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational tools in the form of software packages are burgeoning in the field of medical imaging and biomedical research. These tools enable biomedical researchers to analyze a variety of data using modern machine learning and statistical analysis techniques. While these publicly available software packages are a great step towards a multiplicative increase in the biomedical research productivity, there are still many open issues related to validation and reproducibility of the results. A key gap is that while scientists can validate domain insights that are implicit in the analysis, the analysis itself is coded in a programming language and that domain scientist may not be a programmer. Thus, there is no/limited direct validation of the program that carries out the desired analysis. We propose a novel solution, building upon recent successes in natural language understanding, to address this problem. Our platform allows researchers to perform, share, reproduce and interpret the analysis pipelines and results via natural language. While this approach still requires users to have a conceptual understanding of the techniques, it removes the burden of programming syntax and thus lowers the barriers to advanced and reproducible neuroimaging and biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.