Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411963›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2019

Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case.

Ray A Wickenheiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Legislation for forensic investigative genetic genealogy in Sweden.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use of COVID-19 contact tracing app data as evidence of a crime.Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Expanding DNA database effectiveness.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reimagining forensic science - The mission of the forensic laboratory.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ray A WickenheiserLaboratory System Director, New York State Police Crime Laboratory System, 1220 Washington Ave, Building 30, Albany, NY, 12226-3000, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A case study will be used to examine specific issues of bioethics and forensic science that occur in forensic investigative genealogical searching, which include genetic privacy, discrimination and public safety concerns. The forensic investigative process and various investigative DNA tools will also be described. The Golden State Killer Case (1) will be examined to highlight and discuss forensic ethical issues to develop an ethical framework, as well as provide recommended solutions to pressing public safety and privacy issues facing crime laboratories and criminal investigators. Use of the ethical concept of proportionality (2) will be utilized to contrast and balance competing ethical concerns.

Indexed as

AncestryBioethicsEthnicityFamilial searchingForensic DNAForensic ethicsForensic genealogyForensic scienceGenealogical searchingGenealogyInvestigative genealogyPartial matchingPhenotypingProportionality

Identifiers

PMID32411963
PMCPMC7219171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.