ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2019
Immunoassay detection of fly artifacts produced by several species of necrophagous flies following feeding on human blood.
Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identity of the numerous bloodstains at the murder scene: molecular identification of fly artifacts and fly species by CO1 analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Morphological characterization using scanning electron microscopy of fly artifacts deposited by Calliphora vomitoria (Diptera: Calliphoridae) on household materials.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- A DNA-based method for distinction of fly artifacts from human bloodstains.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Detection of fly artifacts from four species of necrophagous flies on household materials using immunoassays.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Commentary on: Rivers DB et al. Immunoassay detection of fly artifacts produced by several species of necrophagous flies following feeding on human blood. Forensic Science International: Synergy 2019;1(1):1-10.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foraging behavior of necrophagous flies commonly leads to distortion of human bloodstains and production of artifacts that confound reconstruction efforts at crime scenes. Currently there is no reliable method for detection of fly-derived stains or distinction of the artifacts from human bloodstains. To overcome these deficiencies, a confirmatory test was developed based on immunological detection of cathepsin D found in digestive fluids of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.