ArticleBiology methods & protocols2020
Rapid, modular, and cost-effective generation of donor DNA constructs for CRISPR-based gene knock-in.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome editing inSTAR protocols · 2022Article
- Learn to segment single cells with deep distance estimator and deep cell detector.Computers in biology and medicine · 2019Article
- Investigating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition with integrated computational and experimental approaches.Physical biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based gene editing techniques find applications in many fields, such as molecular biology, cancer biology, and disease modeling. In contrast to the knock-out procedure, a key step of CRISPR knock-in experiments is the homology-directed repair process that requires donor constructs as repair templates. Therefore, it is desirable to generate a series of donor templates efficiently and cost-effectively. In this study, we developed a new strategy that combines (i) Gibson assembly reaction, (ii) a linker pair composed of eight in silico screened restriction enzyme sites, and (iii) a hierarchical framework, to remarkably improve the efficiency of producing donor constructs for common genes as well as for the genes containing unbalanced guanine-cytosine content and requiring a selectable marker. Furthermore, the approach provides the ability of inserting additional elements into the donor templates, such as single guide RNA recognition sites that have been reported to enhance the efficiency of homology-directed repair. Conclusively, our modularized process is simple, fast, and cost-effective for making donor constructs and benefits the application of CRISPR knock-in methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.