Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411812›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2020

Longitudinal effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on knee osteoarthritis patients measured by functional infrared spectroscopy: a pilot study.

Luca Pollonini, Hongyu Miao, Hyochol Ahn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Assess Central Pain Responses in a Nonpharmacologic Treatment Trial of Osteoarthritis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-invasive brain stimulation for osteoarthritis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca PolloniniUniversity of Houston, Department of Engineering Technology, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-6355
Hongyu MiaoUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4131-3164
Hyochol AhnUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-4876
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
Self-Administered Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Pain in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase II Randomized Sham-Controlled TrialR15NR018050 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MATHIS, KENNETH B · 2019 to 2020
$618k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NINR NIH HHS R15 NR018050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

functional near-infrared spectroscopyknee osteoarthritispaintranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32411812
PMCPMC7203445
OpenAlexW3021544969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.