Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411783›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of reproductive medicine2020

Human Uterine Biopsy: Research Value and Common Pitfalls.

Alison Maclean, Areege Kamal, Meera Adishesh, Rafah Alnafakh, Nicola Tempest, Dharani K Hapangama

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of reproductive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hematological changes associated with COVID-19 infection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Transforming Growth Factor (TGF) β and Endometrial Vascular Maturation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison MacleanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Member of the Liverpool Health Partnership, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-6959
Areege KamalDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Member of the Liverpool Health Partnership, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-9699
Meera AdisheshDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Member of the Liverpool Health Partnership, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0928-8309
Rafah AlnafakhDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Member of the Liverpool Health Partnership, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-5785
Nicola TempestDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Member of the Liverpool Health Partnership, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5209-2985
Dharani K HapangamaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Member of the Liverpool Health Partnership, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-0150
University of Liverpool · GBLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human uterus consists of the inner endometrium, the myometrium, and the outer serosa. Knowledge of the function of the uterus in health and disease is relevant to reproduction, fertility, embryology, gynaecology, endocrinology, and oncology. Research performed on uterine biopsies is essential to further the current understanding of human uterine biology. This brief review explores the value of the uterine biopsy in gynaecological and human fertility research and explores the common problems encountered when analysing data generated from different types of uterine biopsies, with the aim of improving the quality, reproducibility, and clinical translatability of future research.

Identifiers

PMID32411783
PMCPMC7206876
OpenAlexW3022751873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.