Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411731›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Modeling of Torasemide and Furosemide After Oral Repeated Administration in Healthy Dogs.

Ludovic Pelligand, Emilie Guillot, Anne Geneteau, Jerome Guyonnet, Reynald Magnier, Jonathan Elliott, Mathieu Peyrou, Matthieu Jacobs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Safety of torasemide in healthy adult dogs administered daily for 26 weeks.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludovic PelligandDepartment of Comparative Biological Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Emilie GuillotCompanion Animal Franchise, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Anne GeneteauR&D, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Jerome GuyonnetR&D, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Reynald MagnierR&D, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Jonathan ElliottDepartment of Comparative Biological Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Mathieu PeyrouR&D, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Matthieu JacobsR&D, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Département Santé Animale · FRRoyal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Torasemide is a loop diuretic licensed in dogs for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The aim of this pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was to define an optimally effective dosage regimen based on preclinical data. In a first study, 5 dogs received once-daily oral torasemide (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mg/kg/day) for 14 days. A second study compared once-daily oral torasemide (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 mg/kg/day) to twice-daily furosemide (1, 2, 4, 8 mg/kg/day). For all doses of the second study, 11 dogs received a first day of treatment, followed by a 3 day washout and resumed daily treatment for 10 days (until Day 14). Blood and urine were collected to measure urinary torasemide excretion and plasma torasemide concentrations and daily diuresis and natriuresis. Torasemide PK was linear. After rapid absorption (T

Indexed as

aldosteronediuresisloop-diureticmodelingnatriuresisNon Linear Mixed Effect Model (NLME)PK/PDurine

Identifiers

PMID32411731
PMCPMC7199743
OpenAlexW3019468074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.