Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411682›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Nutritional, Energy and Sanitary Aspects of Swine Manure and Carcass Co-digestion.

Deisi Cristina Tápparo, Paula Rogovski, Rafael Dorighello Cadamuro, Doris Sobral Marques Souza, Charline Bonatto, Aline Frumi Camargo, Thamarys Scapini, Fábio Stefanski, André Amaral, Airton Kunz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial profiling of swine-waste digestates: implications for biofertilizer application.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Deisi Cristina TápparoWestern Paraná State University - UNIOESTE/CCET/PGEAGRI, Cascavel, Brazil.
Paula RogovskiLaboratory of Applied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Rafael Dorighello CadamuroLaboratory of Applied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Doris Sobral Marques SouzaLaboratory of Applied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Charline BonattoDepartment of Chemical and Food Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Aline Frumi CamargoLaboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, Brazil.
Thamarys ScapiniLaboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, Brazil.
Fábio StefanskiLaboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, Brazil.
André AmaralWestern Paraná State University - UNIOESTE/CCET/PGEAGRI, Cascavel, Brazil.
Airton KunzEmbrapa Suínos e Aves, Concórdia, Brazil.
Marta HernándezLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain.
Helen TreichelLaboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, Brazil.
David Rodríguez-LázaroDivision of Microbiology, Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Universidad de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Gislaine FongaroLaboratory of Applied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRInstituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León · ESUniversidad de Burgos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renewable energy can assist the management of the effects of population growth and rapid economic development on the sustainability of animal husbandry. The primary aim of renewable energy is to minimize the use of fossil fuels via the creation of environmentally friendly energy products from depleted fossil fuels. Digesters that treat swine manure are extensively used in treatment systems; and inclusion of swine carcasses can increase the organic loading rate (OLR) thereby improving biogas yield and productivity on farms. However, the characteristics of the components including animal residues, proteins, lipids, remains of undigested feed items, antimicrobial drug residues, pathogenic microorganisms and nutrient contents, are complex and diverse. It is therefore necessary to manage the anaerobic process stability and digestate purification for subsequent use as fertilizer. Efficient methane recovery from residues rich in lipids is difficult because such residues are only slowly biodegradable. Pretreatment can promote solubilization of lipids and accelerate anaerobic digestion, and pretreatments can process the swine carcass before its introduction onto biodigesters. This review presents an overview of the anaerobic digestion of swine manure and carcasses. We analyze the characteristics of these residues, and we identify strategies to enhance biogas yield and process stability. We consider energy potential, co-digestion of swine manure and carcasses, physical, chemical, and biological pretreatment of biomass, sanitary aspects of swine manure and co-digestates and their recycling as fertilizers.

Indexed as

biogasbiohydrogennutrientpurificationswine chain

Identifiers

PMID32411682
PMCPMC7200981
OpenAlexW3023459763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.