ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2020
Digital subtraction angiographic characteristics of progression of moyamoya disease 6 months prior to surgical revascularisation.
Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed Intracerebral Hemorrhage 15 Years After Indirect Revascularization in Moyamoya Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Potential of unilateral combined bypass surgery to accelerate contralateral radiological progression in pediatric moyamoya disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Imaging methods for surgical revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease: an updated review.Neurosurgical review · 2022Review
- Progression in Moyamoya Disease: Clinical Features, Neuroimaging Evaluation, and Treatment.Current neuropharmacology · 2022Review
- Indirect revascularization vs. non-surgical treatment for Moyamoya disease and Moyamoya syndrome: A comparative effectiveness study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the natural angiographic course of moyamoya disease (MMD) is lacking. It takes about 6 months for waiting for revascularisation surgery. The issue of when to perform subtraction angiography (DSA) for follow-up remains unclear. We investigated the natural course of MMD by DSA and attempted to determine the best interval to perform the follow-up DSA. Methods: This is a single-centre cohort study of Chinese MMD inpatients treated from 1 January 2015 to 31 August 2019. Their angiographic findings were evaluated on Suzuki stage and collateral circulation between two follow-ups of the same hemisphere. Results: A total of 110 patients who met the criteria were enrolled in this study. After a median 6 months follow-up, five patients (4.5%) had progression, four females and one male. Time interval of progression ranged from 4 to 137 months with a mean of 61.4 months. Of five patients with progression, four had unilateral lesion (two ipsilateral and two contralateral) and one had bilateral lesions. Collateral circulation was changed in three of five patients. Conclusions: The angiographic evidence of progression in MMD was rare in the short-term follow-up, and most patients with progression had initial unilateral involvement. DSA re-examination may be not needed in patients with bilateral MMD, but needed in unilateral MMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.