Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411384›Full record

ArticleCell discovery2020

Characterization of a novel type III CRISPR-Cas effector provides new insights into the allosteric activation and suppression of the Cas10 DNase.

Jinzhong Lin, Mingxia Feng, Heping Zhang, Qunxin She

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell discovery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in CRISPR/Cas9-Based Gene Editing in Filamentous Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Allosteric crosstalk in modular proteins: Function fine-tuning and drug design.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinzhong Lin1Archaea Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-3243
Mingxia Feng1Archaea Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Heping Zhang3Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018 Hohhot, China.
Qunxin She4Microbial Technology Institute and State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, 72 Binhai Road, Jimo, 266237 Qingdao, Shandong China.
University of Copenhagen · DKInner Mongolia Agricultural University · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

Det Frie Forskningsråd (Danish Council for Independent Research) DFF-4181-00274National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31771380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiviral defense by type III CRISPR-Cas systems relies on two distinct activities of their effectors: the RNA-activated DNA cleavage and synthesis of cyclic oligoadenylate. Both activities are featured as indiscriminate nucleic acid cleavage and subjected to the spatiotemporal regulation. To yield further insights into the involved mechanisms, we reconstituted LdCsm, a lactobacilli III-A system in

Indexed as

DNA metabolismmiRNAsRibozymes

Identifiers

PMID32411384
PMCPMC7214462
OpenAlexW3022066097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.