Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411382›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2020

Effect of erythropoietin on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kien Vinh Trinh, Dion Diep, Kevin Jia Qi Chen, Le Huang, Oleksiy Gulenko

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Erythropoiesis-Targeted Doping in Sports: From Improved Oxygen Transport to Cardiovascular Risk.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The treatment of chronic anemia in heart failure: a global approach.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kien Vinh TrinhFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dion DiepMD Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-3634
Kevin Jia Qi ChenMD Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Le HuangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Oleksiy GulenkoAncaster Sports Medicine Centre, Ancaster, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAFaculty of Public Health · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAthletes have attempted to glean the ergogenic benefits of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) since it became available in the 1980s. However, there is limited consensus in the literature regarding its true performance-enhancing effects. In fact, some studies suggest there is no conclusive evidence; therefore, it is necessary to evaluate and quantify the strength of the evidence.

objectiveTo determine the effects of erythropoietin on enhancing athletic performance.

designAt least two independent reviewers conducted citation identification through abstract and full-text screening, and study selection, and extracted raw data on demographics, descriptions of interventions and all outcomes to predesigned abstraction forms. Outcomes were stratified by treatment periods and dosages. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Education (GRADE) scale. Where appropriate, quantitative analysis was performed. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE and SPORTDiscus were searched from their inception to January 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Trials that examined any enhancement in sport in healthy participants aged 18-65 using rHuEPO compared with placebo were included.

resultsOverall, there is low-to-moderate quality evidence suggesting rHuEPO may be more beneficial than placebo in enhancing haematological parameters, pulmonary measures, maximal power output and time to exhaustion independent of dosage. However, these improvements are almost exclusively seen during maximal exercise intensities, which may be less relevant to athletic competition conditions.

conclusionDue to heterogeneity among trials, more high-quality randomised controlled trials with larger sample sizes in conditions that mirror actual competition are needed to further elucidate these effects.

Indexed as

athletic performancedopingEPOerythropoietinsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32411382
PMCPMC7213874
OpenAlexW3022193102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.