Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Quantifying Light Response of Leaf-Scale Water-Use Efficiency and Its Interrelationships With Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance in C

Zi-Piao Ye, Yu Ling, Qiang Yu, Hong-Lang Duan, Hua-Jing Kang, Guo-Min Huang, Shi-Hua Duan, Xian-Mao Chen, Yu-Guo Liu, Shuang-Xi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Different physiological responses of C3 and C4 plants to nanomaterials.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zi-Piao YeMaths & Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China.
Yu LingCollege of Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Qiang YuState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Hong-Lang DuanJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems and Watershed Ecohydrology, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China.
Hua-Jing KangDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science & Technology, Wenzhou, China.
Guo-Min HuangJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems and Watershed Ecohydrology, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China.
Shi-Hua DuanSchool of Life Sciences, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China.
Xian-Mao ChenSoil Fertilizer and Environmental Resources Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China.
Yu-Guo LiuInstitute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
Shuang-Xi ZhouThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Havelock North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light intensity (

Indexed as

irradianceleaf gas exchangelight response curvemaximum water use efficiencymodelplant functional type (PFT)saturation light intensitytranspiration

Identifiers

PMID32411151
PMCPMC7199201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.