Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32411138›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2020

Induction of Identical IgG HIV-1 Envelope Epitope Recognition Patterns After Initial HIVIS-DNA/MVA-CMDR Immunization and a Late MVA-CMDR Boost.

Agricola Joachim, Mohamed I M Ahmed, Georgios Pollakis, Lisa Rogers, Verena S Hoffmann, Patricia Munseri, Said Aboud, Eligius F Lyamuya, Muhammad Bakari, Merlin L Robb and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Agricola JoachimDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mohamed I M AhmedDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georgios PollakisFaculty of Health and Life Science, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lisa RogersDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Verena S HoffmannDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Patricia MunseriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Said AboudDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Eligius F LyamuyaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muhammad BakariTanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Merlin L RobbWalter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), Rockville, MD, United States.
Britta WahrenDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eric SandstromDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotta NilssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Gunnel BiberfeldDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christof GeldmacherDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kathrin HeldDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZKarolinska Institutet · SEGerman Center for Infection Research · DEMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZPublic Health Agency of Sweden · SEUniversity of Liverpool · GBWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the RV144 trial, to date the only HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial demonstrating a modestly reduced risk of HIV-1 acquisition, antibody responses toward the HIV Envelope protein (Env) variable (V) 2 and V3 regions were shown to be correlated with a reduced risk of infection. These potentially protective antibody responses, in parallel with the vaccine efficacy, however, waned quickly. Dissecting vaccine-induced IgG recognition of antigenic regions and their variants within the HIV-1 Env from different vaccine trials will aid in designing future HIV-1 immunogens and vaccination schedules. We, therefore, analyzed the IgG response toward linear HIV-1 Env epitopes elicited by a multi-clade, multigene HIVIS-DNA priming, and heterologous recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA-CMDR) boosting regimen (HIVIS03) and assessed whether a late MVA-CMDR boost 3 years after completion of the initial vaccination schedule (HIVIS06) restored antibody responses toward these epitopes. Here we report that vaccination schedule in the HIVIS03 trial elicited IgG responses against linear epitopes within the V2 and V3 tip as well as against the gp41 immunodominant region in a high proportion of vaccinees. Antibodies against the V2 and gp41 Env regions were restricted to variants with close homology to the MVA-CMDR immunogen sequence, while V3 responses were more cross-reactive. Boosting with a late third MVA-CMDR after 3 years effectively restored waned IgG responses to linear Env epitopes and induced targeting of identical antigenic regions and variants comparable to the previous combined HIVIS-DNA/MVA-CMDR regimen. Our findings support the notion that anti-HIV-1 Env responses, associated with a reduced risk of infection in RV144, could be maintained by regular boosting with a single dose of MVA-CMDR.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingCross ReactionsEpitopesHealthy VolunteersHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Envelope Protein gp41HIV InfectionsHumansImmunization ScheduleImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GPeptide FragmentsPhylogenyAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingEpitopesHIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV envelope protein gp120 (305-321)HIV Envelope Protein gp41Immunoglobulin GMVA vaccinePeptide FragmentsVaccines, DNAViral Vaccinesenvelope (Env)envelope-specific antibody responseepitope variantshuman immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1)immunogen sequenceimmunogen structurelinear peptide arrayvaccine

Identifiers

PMID32411138
PMCPMC7198863
OpenAlexW3022093750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.