ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020
Time Window Determination for Inference of Time-Varying Dynamics: Application to Cardiorespiratory Interaction.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological Noise in Cardiorespiratory Time-Varying Interactions.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Editorial: Cardio-respiratory-brain integrative physiology: interactions, mechanisms, and methods for assessment.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Mild poikilocapnic hypoxia increases very low frequency haemoglobin oxygenation oscillations in prefrontal cortex.Biological research · 2021Article
- Coupling between Blood Pressure and Subarachnoid Space Width Oscillations during Slow Breathing.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interacting dynamical systems abound in nature, with examples ranging from biology and population dynamics, through physics and chemistry, to communications and climate. Often their states, parameters and functions are time-varying, because such systems interact with other systems and the environment, exchanging information and matter. A common problem when analysing time-series data from dynamical systems is how to determine the length of the time window for the analysis. When one needs to follow the time-variability of the dynamics, or the dynamical parameters and functions, the time window needs to be resolved first. We tackled this problem by introducing a method for adaptive determination of the time window for interacting oscillators, as modeled and scaled for the cardiorespiratory interaction. By investigating a system of coupled phase oscillators and utilizing the Dynamical Bayesian Inference method, we propose a procedure to determine the time window and the propagation parameter of the covariance matrix. The optimal values are determined so that the inferred parameters follow the dynamics of the actual ones and at the same time the error of the inference represented by the covariance matrix is minimal. The effectiveness of the methodology is presented on a system of coupled limit-cycle oscillators and on the cardiorespiratory interaction. Three cases of cardiorespiratory interaction were considered-measurement with spontaneous free breathing, one with periodic sine breathing and one with a-periodic time-varying breathing. The results showed that the cardiorespiratory coupling strength and similarity of form of coupling functions have greater values for slower breathing, and this variability follows continuously the change of the breathing frequency. The method can be applied effectively to other time-varying oscillatory interactions and carries important implications for analysis of general dynamical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.