Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Opportunities and Challenges for Using Automatic Human Affect Analysis in Consumer Research.

Dennis Küster, Eva G Krumhuber, Lars Steinert, Anuj Ahuja, Marc Baker, Tanja Schultz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Artificial intelligence and ethics in healthcare-balancing act or symbiosis?]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dennis KüsterCognitive Systems Lab, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Eva G KrumhuberDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lars SteinertCognitive Systems Lab, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Anuj AhujaMaharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi, India.
Marc BakerCentre for Situated Action and Communication, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Tanja SchultzCognitive Systems Lab, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
University of Bremen · DEGuru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University · INUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Portsmouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to automatically assess emotional responses via contact-free video recording taps into a rapidly growing market aimed at predicting consumer choices. If consumer attention and engagement are measurable in a reliable and accessible manner, relevant marketing decisions could be informed by objective data. Although significant advances have been made in automatic affect recognition, several practical and theoretical issues remain largely unresolved. These concern the lack of cross-system validation, a historical emphasis of posed over spontaneous expressions, as well as more fundamental issues regarding the weak association between subjective experience and facial expressions. To address these limitations, the present paper argues that extant commercial and free facial expression classifiers should be rigorously validated in cross-system research. Furthermore, academics and practitioners must better leverage fine-grained emotional response dynamics, with stronger emphasis on understanding naturally occurring spontaneous expressions, and in naturalistic choice settings. We posit that applied consumer research might be better situated to examine facial behavior in socio-emotional contexts rather than decontextualized, laboratory studies, and highlight how AHAA can be successfully employed in this context. Also, facial activity should be considered less as a single outcome variable, and more as a starting point for further analyses. Implications of this approach and potential obstacles that need to be overcome are discussed within the context of consumer research.

Indexed as

automatic human affect analysis (AHAA)consumer researchdynamic responsesfacial expressionmachine learningspontaneous expressions

Identifiers

PMID32410956
PMCPMC7199103
OpenAlexW3023585286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.