Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410868›Full record

ReviewMediators of inflammation2020

Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: Pathophysiology, Current Clinical Management, and Potential Preventive Approaches.

César Daniel Sánchez-Hernández, Lucero Aidé Torres-Alarcón, Ariadna González-Cortés, Alberto N Peón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Reperfusion injury in STEMI: a double-edged sword.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

César Daniel Sánchez-HernándezSociedad Española de Beneficencia (SEB), Pachuca, Hgo, Mexico.
Lucero Aidé Torres-AlarcónSociedad Española de Beneficencia (SEB), Pachuca, Hgo, Mexico.
Ariadna González-CortésSociedad Española de Beneficencia (SEB), Pachuca, Hgo, Mexico.
Alberto N PeónSociedad Española de Beneficencia (SEB), Pachuca, Hgo, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6951-2248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia reperfusion syndrome is a complex entity where many inflammatory mediators play different roles, both to enhance myocardial infarction-derived damage and to heal injury. In such a setting, the establishment of an effective therapy to treat this condition has been elusive, perhaps because the experimental treatments have been conceived to block just one of the many pathogenic pathways of the disease, or because they thwart the tissue-repairing phase of the syndrome. Either way, we think that a discussion about the pathophysiology of the disease and the mechanisms of action of some drugs may shed some clarity on the topic.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateImmunosuppression TherapyInflammationInflammation MediatorsIschemiaMiceMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial ReperfusionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryPhenotypeReperfusion InjuryTh1 CellsTh2 CellsInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID32410868
PMCPMC7204323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.