Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410801›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2020

Data mining-based model and risk prediction of colorectal cancer by using secondary health data: A systematic review.

Hailun Liang, Lei Yang, Lei Tao, Leiyu Shi, Wuyang Yang, Jiawei Bai, Da Zheng, Ning Wang, Jiafu Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hailun LiangSchool of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Lei YangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Lei TaoDepartment of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Leiyu ShiJohns Hopkins Primary Care Policy Center, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Wuyang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Jiawei BaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Da ZhengDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Ning WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Jiafu JiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevention and early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) can increase the chances of successful treatment and reduce burden. Various data mining technologies have been utilized to strengthen the early detection of CRC in primary care. Evidence synthesis on the model's effectiveness is scant. This systematic review synthesizes studies that examine the effect of data mining on improving risk prediction of CRC.

methodsThe PRISMA framework guided the conduct of this study. We obtained papers via PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Google Scholar. Quality appraisal was performed using Downs and Black's quality checklist. To evaluate the performance of included models, the values of specificity and sensitivity were comparted, the values of area under the curve (AUC) were plotted, and the median of overall AUC of included studies was computed.

resultsA total of 316 studies were reviewed for full text. Seven articles were included. Included studies implement techniques including artificial neural networks, Bayesian networks and decision trees. Six articles reported the overall model accuracy. Overall, the median AUC is 0.8243 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.8050-0.8886]. In the two articles that reported comparison results with traditional models, the data mining method performed better than the traditional models, with the best AUC improvement of 10.7%.

conclusionsThe adoption of data mining technologies for CRC detection is at an early stage. Limited numbers of included articles and heterogeneity of those studies implied that more rigorous research is expected to further investigate the techniques' effects.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdata miningdisease detectionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32410801
PMCPMC7219096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.