Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410707›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2020

Knowledge and attitudes of physicians toward research ethics and scientific misconduct in Lebanon.

Bilal Azakir, Hassan Mobarak, Sami Al Najjar, Azza Abou El Naga, Najlaa Mashaal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Research Ethics among Researchers in Nepal.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bilal AzakirFaculty of Medicine, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hassan MobarakFaculty of Medicine, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sami Al NajjarFaculty of Medicine, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Azza Abou El NagaFaculty of Medicine, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Najlaa MashaalFaculty of Medicine, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon. najlaa.mashaal@bau.edu.lb.
Beirut Arab University · LB

Funding

Joint Fund between Beirut Arab University and the Lebanese National Counsil for Scientific Research (LNCSR) 12-05-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the implementation of codes and declarations of medical research ethics, unethical behavior is still reported among researchers. Most of the medical faculties have included topics related to medical research ethics and developed ethical committees; yet, in some cases, unethical behaviors are still observed, and many obstacles are still conferring to applying these guidelines.

methodsThis cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted by interviewing randomly selected 331 Lebanese physicians across Lebanon, to assess their awareness, knowledge and attitudes on practice regarding international and national research ethics guidelines (Lebanese decrees/Laws and CNRS chart of ethics) and scientific misconduct and misbehaviors.

resultsOur results revealed that although majority of participants declared familiar with ethical principles governing research that involves human subjects (79.5%), the overall mean score achieved on their knowledge questions was 46%. Only 27.4% are aware of the presence of the Lebanese National Consultative Committee on Ethics (LNCCE), with only half of them aware of its functions and only 25.7% know about the charter of ethics and guiding principles of scientific research in Lebanon. Significant higher levels of research ethics knowledge were recorded among Ph.D. degree-holding subjects, higher university positions as in professors, research ethics trainings-attendees, and physicians with prior research experience. A significant correlation was observed between knowledge of research ethics principles and positive attitudes toward research ethics principles. Noteworthy, we found that more than one third of participants have reported witnessing scientific misconduct and misbehaviors at some period of their careers.

conclusionsThe presence of low mean awareness levels regarding research ethical principles among the study population of physicians and high levels of perception of scientific misconduct raises concern on the importance of implementing proper training for physicians on research ethics.

Indexed as

PhysiciansScientific MisconductAttitudeChildCross-Sectional StudiesEthics, ResearchFemaleHumansLebanonMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeKnowledgeLebanonMisconductPhysiciansResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID32410707
PMCPMC7227247
OpenAlexW3024021665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.