Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410618›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Adaptive design: adaptation and adoption of patient safety practices in daily routines, a multi-site study.

Connie Dekker-van Doorn, Linda Wauben, Jeroen van Wijngaarden, Johan Lange, Robbert Huijsman

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Connie Dekker-van DoornRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rochussenstraat 198, 3015, EK, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.m.dekker-van.doorn@hr.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8544-5014
Linda WaubenRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rochussenstraat 198, 3015, EK, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen van WijngaardenErasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, P.O. Box 738, 3000, DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan LangeErasmus University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robbert HuijsmanErasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, P.O. Box 738, 3000, DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost interventions to improve patient safety (Patient Safety Practices (PSPs)), are introduced without engaging front-line professionals. Administrative staff, managers and sometimes a few professionals, representing only one or two disciplines, decide what to change and how. Consequently, PSPs are not fully adapted to the professionals' needs or to the local context and as a result, adoption is low. To support adoption, two theoretical concepts, Participatory Design and Experiential Learning were combined in a new model: Adaptive Design. The aim was to explore whether Adaptive Design supports adaptation and adoption of PSPs by engaging all professionals and creating time to (re) design, reflect and learn as a team. The Time Out Procedure (TOP) and Debriefing (plus) for improving patient safety in the operating theatre (OT) was used as PSP.

methodsQualitative exploratory multi-site study using participatory action research as a research design. The implementation process consisted of four phases: 1) start-up: providing information by presentations and team meetings, 2) pilot: testing the prototype with 100 surgical procedures, 3) small scale implementation: with one or two surgical disciplines, 4) implementation hospital-wide: including all surgical disciplines. In iterations, teams (re) designed, tested, evaluated, and if necessary adapted TOPplus. Gradually all professionals were included. Adaptations in content, process and layout of TOPplus were measured following each iteration. Adoption was monitored until final implementation in every hospital's OT.

results10 Dutch hospitals participated. Adaptations varied per hospital, but all hospitals adapted both procedures. Adaptations concerned the content, process and layout of TOPplus. Both procedures were adopted in all OTs, but user participation and time to include all users varied between hospitals. Ultimately all users were actively involved and TOPplus was implemented in all OTs.

conclusionsEngaging all professionals in a structured bottom-up implementation approach with a focus on learning, improves adaptation and adoption of a PSP. As a result, all 10 participating hospitals implemented TOPplus with all surgical disciplines in all OTs. Adaptive Design gives professionals the opportunity to adapt the PSP to their own needs and their specific local context. All hospitals adapted TOPplus, but without compromising the essential features for its effectiveness.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatient SafetyHumansLearningNetherlandsPersonnel, HospitalPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSafety ManagementDesignEngaging professionalsLearnStructured bottom-up implementation approach

Identifiers

PMID32410618
PMCPMC7227082
OpenAlexW3027368161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.